
Mr Sarcastic wrote:Thanks, but I'm still not seeing how this would decrease times in any noticeable way, considering the weight of the egg. It would seem to me that you would need power to spin the blades fast enough to slow the descent.




techmaster55 wrote:I would also like to say, in the rules it says that "a" roter may be used, this means that there can only be one rotor on the device correct?




First place team was a little under 6 seconds. Only 2 teams got a better time (approx +.1 & +.6 sec) & both of their eggs broke.Any national times?

fleet130 wrote:First place team was a little under 6 seconds. Only 2 teams got a better time (approx +.1 & +.6 sec) & both of their eggs broke.Any national times?

Several variables determine whether or not the egg breaks.What would make the egg from a team with a slower/longer flight drop time break as compared to a team with a faster/shorter drop time.

wlsguy wrote:techmaster55 wrote:I would also like to say, in the rules it says that "a" roter may be used, this means that there can only be one rotor on the device correct?
We tried this at Wright State this year.
Our "Helicopter" had a single blade that went all the way around (think big flat disk made of balsa and covered in a plastic film).
Another way to envision this is to google "Da Vinchi Helicopter".
It effectively turned the "blade" into a parachute.
We then decided it may be DQ's as not in the "Spirit of the Problem" and cut the blade into 2 pieces and created two large blades that almost touched.
The result; our Helicopter dropped slower than everyone elses (highest decent time) but unfortunatley, due to egg placement, the egg cracked.
Do I think it was still legal? No, I think it still was very close to stretching the "Spirit of the Problem".
I'm just hoping these questions get worked out before this becomes an event or it may set the record for FAQs.

By whose clock? I don't have a copy of the spreadsheet available, but I'm pretty sure there were no times over 7 seconds.but the people that did said that they got 7.96 seconds

fleet130 wrote:By whose clock? I don't have a copy of the spreadsheet available, but I'm pretty sure there were no times over 7 seconds.but the people that did said that they got 7.96 seconds

Return to 2012 Building Events
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest