Shock Value B

Re: Shock Value B

Postby blue cobra on Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:17 pm

If they give you a circuit diagram with a bunch of different switches (let's say S1, S2, S3, and S4) and light bulbs (let's say L1, L2, and L3), and they say "If switch S1 is closed, what are the conditions of lamps L1, L2, and L3" we should assume that S2, S3, and S4 are open, correct?
In full color since 2006
User avatar
blue cobra
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:10 pm
Division: Grad
State: NY

Re: Shock Value B

Postby robotman on Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:25 pm

blue cobra wrote:If they give you a circuit diagram with a bunch of different switches (let's say S1, S2, S3, and S4) and light bulbs (let's say L1, L2, and L3), and they say "If switch S1 is closed, what are the conditions of lamps L1, L2, and L3" we should assume that S2, S3, and S4 are open, correct?


I would suggest asking the proctor what they mean by that just so that there is no chance to lose points
User avatar
robotman
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1257
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:37 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1
Division: Grad
State: TX

Re: Shock Value B

Postby blue cobra on Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:34 pm

I did at Regionals, but they said they couldn't tell me.
In full color since 2006
User avatar
blue cobra
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:10 pm
Division: Grad
State: NY

Re: Shock Value B

Postby robotman on Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:36 pm

if they wouldn't tell you than yea assume that everything else is open
it was a group of parallel correct?
User avatar
robotman
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1257
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 10:37 pm
Location: 127.0.0.1
Division: Grad
State: TX

Re: Shock Value B

Postby blue cobra on Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:46 pm

Ok that's what I was thinking. Thanks.

For Regionals imagine a parallel circuit with 3 branches. One switch was in series, so it controlled the whole thing. Then there was a switch on each branch. As well, the last branch was further broken into two branches in parallel, with one lamp on each. The switch on this branch was positioned such that it controlled both lamps. So for Regionals there were 4 lamps and 4 switches.

Also, has anyone actually seen Kirchoff's Laws and combo circuits on a test? This event just seems way too simple. It's got me paranoid :roll:
In full color since 2006
User avatar
blue cobra
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:10 pm
Division: Grad
State: NY

Re: Shock Value B

Postby fleet130 on Mon Apr 05, 2010 1:10 am

they say "If switch S1 is closed, what are the conditions of lamps L1, L2, and L3" we should assume that S2, S3, and S4 are open, correct?
You should assume each switch is as drawn in the diagram(except for those where they state the condition in the problem). If a switch is drawn closed, you should assume it is closed, If it's drawn open, assume it's open.
Information expressed here is solely the opinion of the author. Any similarity to that of the management or any official instrument is purely coincidental! Doing Science Olympiad since 1987!
User avatar
fleet130
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 430
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2001 7:06 pm
Location: Mare Tranquillitatis

Re: Shock Value B

Postby Avis_de-Incendia on Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:20 am

blue cobra wrote:Ok that's what I was thinking. Thanks.

For Regionals imagine a parallel circuit with 3 branches. One switch was in series, so it controlled the whole thing. Then there was a switch on each branch. As well, the last branch was further broken into two branches in parallel, with one lamp on each. The switch on this branch was positioned such that it controlled both lamps. So for Regionals there were 4 lamps and 4 switches.

Also, has anyone actually seen Kirchoff's Laws and combo circuits on a test? This event just seems way too simple. It's got me paranoid :roll:


I've seen "theoretical" combination circuits, where they ask you what the combined resistance would be if you combined a parallel circuit with one resistance and a series circuit with two resistance.

But that was like, the bonus.
Hello! :]
User avatar
Avis_de-Incendia
Member
Member
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2009 4:56 pm
Location: Why would you want to know this?
Division: B
State: -

Re: Shock Value B

Postby andrewwski on Thu Apr 08, 2010 7:53 pm

I'd imagine combined series/parallel circuits are quite common...but maybe they're grossly simplifying the event...
Please read Forum Rule #2:
2. Posts should have a legitimate purpose.
User avatar
andrewwski
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 872
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:36 pm
Division: Grad
State: -

Re: Shock Value B

Postby blue cobra on Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:06 pm

Could someone please explain the wye and delta arrangements? They seem common on old Circuit Lab tests. Even if they are not those specific arrangements, I'm very insure of how to go about solving for things like that. A fine example would be in Section 2 of this test, the answer key for which can be found here. I have no idea how they got those answers. I'm also very unsure about questions about voltages between terminals. Any help in these areas would be appreciated.

And there aren't going to be capacitors in this event, are there?
In full color since 2006
User avatar
blue cobra
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:10 pm
Division: Grad
State: NY

Re: Shock Value B

Postby tclme elmo on Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:57 pm

I'm new to Shock Value, and only know VERY VERY basics. But how much about magnetism do we need to know?
2011
Rustin Invitational - 1st
Solon Invitational - 8th
Regionals - 1st
States - 1st
Nationals - 11th
User avatar
tclme elmo
Member
Member
 
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 3:55 pm
Location: Pennsylvania, Strath Haven
Division: B
State: HI

Re: Shock Value B

Postby SpaceJunkie on Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:44 pm

Blue Cobra: no capacitors in the event, in a rules clarification sent to me by email (is not part of basic DC circuit theory).

tclme elmo : Basically stuff like magnetic field directions, for electromagnets and ferromagnets, electromagnet design, magnetic materials, and devices that use magnetism (like compass and other stuff). At our state competition, they asked us what it would make if a wire was wrapped around a compass (galvanometer).

A very common question is about stuff like which way will a compass needle deflect if a wire is placed near it, which way is the magnetic field if the wire wire is placed in a direction, etc. Something you should ask at each tournament is what current refers to, conventional current or electron flow? They travel in opposite directions, and since a current-induced magnetic field rotates clockwise when the current is moving away, they can mess up your score.

Add. Info: a compass needle placed near a wire will stay perpendicularly to the wire, with the north end pointing to the direction of the rotation (of the magnetic field). I recommend http://www.walter-fendt.de/ph14e/mfwire.htm to visualise this.
Possible Events:
Microbe Mission, Junkyard Challenge

Probable Events:
Shock Value, Dynamic Planet, Optics, Solar System
SpaceJunkie
Member
Member
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 5:49 pm
Location: St. Louis
Division: B
State: MO

Re: Shock Value B

Postby andrewwski on Wed Apr 14, 2010 11:15 pm

blue cobra wrote:Could someone please explain the wye and delta arrangements? They seem common on old Circuit Lab tests. Even if they are not those specific arrangements, I'm very insure of how to go about solving for things like that. A fine example would be in Section 2 of this test, the answer key for which can be found here. I have no idea how they got those answers. I'm also very unsure about questions about voltages between terminals. Any help in these areas would be appreciated.

And there aren't going to be capacitors in this event, are there?


Wye and Delta generally refer to a three-terminal connection of resistors. In the Wye arrangement, you have three resistors that tie together at a central point. The path between any two terminals takes you through two resistors in series.

Image

The Delta arrangement has resistors directly between adjacent terminals. Now you want to think about the paths between the two terminals you are testing. There are two paths in parallel - one that takes you through the resistor between the two, and one that takes you through the other two resistors in series. Thus, apply the series and parallel methods of calculating your resistance to get your result.

Image

This is a pretty good explanation of the different configurations.
http://www.play-hookey.com/dc_theory/delta_wye.html

You can apply this to problems like those in the test you linked. For example, let's look at Section 2, Problem 1. What are the paths from A to B? There is the simple direct path through R1, at a resistance of 5k. Then there is the path from B to C and then C to A and C to D to A (the Delta configuration). So let's break that down.

What is the resistance between points C and A? This is the delta configuration, we further break it down and ask what the paths for current are. We get through R5 (25k) and the series of R2 and R3 (15k + 20k = 35k). So the resistance between C and A is the parallel resistance of 25k and 35k = (25k*35k)/(25k+35k) = 14.58k.

Now we want the resistance between B and A through the "long" path. That's simple - it's a series of R4 plus the delta arrangement, which we found to be 14.58k. So it equals 10k + 14.58k = 24.58k.

Now we've established the resistances of our two parallel paths from A to B. They are 5k, through R1, and 24.58k, going the other way. The parallel resistance then is (5*24.58)/(5+24.58) = 4.15k, which checks out with the answer key.

You would use the same method to calculate the resistance across AD, BC, and CD. AC would be a tad different - but the same principles still apply.

You have not two, but three paths for the current between AC - directly across R5, and through the two other branches, R1+R4 and R2+R3. So let's find the resistance of those branches, which is done by simply adding the resistors as they are in series. R2+R3 = 15k + 20k = 35k and R1+R4 = 5k+10k = 15k. Now we have three resistances in parallel - 25k (R5), 35k, and 15k. The parallel resistance is 1/(1/25+1/35+1/15) = 7.39k, also consistent with the answer key.

For questions 5 and 6, if R2 is shorted, just assume it's not there. Calculate BC as earlier but don't add R2 to R3, as it's shorted - R3 will be the only resistance through that "branch". If R1 is open, no current will flow across it, so the R1-R4 branch will not be part of the circuit - thus just calculate the Delta of C-D and C-A-D.

To calculate voltages, apply Ohm's and Kirchoff's Laws. You have resistance. Know that for each parallel branch, voltage is constant (thus the total voltage flows down each branch). In series, you know that current is constant, so calculate current for the total resistance of that branch (add the series resistors together). That current is the current through each resistor in series in the branch. Once you get resistance and current in a resistor, you can apply Ohm's Law and solve for voltage.
Please read Forum Rule #2:
2. Posts should have a legitimate purpose.
User avatar
andrewwski
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 872
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:36 pm
Division: Grad
State: -

Re: Shock Value B

Postby blue cobra on Mon Apr 26, 2010 5:54 pm

A bit late, but thanks very much for that, andrewwski!

What are the most difficult concepts people have seen on their state tests?

EDIT: Not needed. My state test was the easiest test I have ever seen. I'm actually a little disappointed. I think you only had to know Ohm's law, the symbol of a battery, and some very basic motor/magnetism stuff.
In full color since 2006
User avatar
blue cobra
Exalted Member
Exalted Member
 
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2009 9:10 pm
Division: Grad
State: NY

Re: Shock Value B

Postby ichaelm on Mon May 24, 2010 4:00 pm

Did anyone else here take the nationals test? I thought it was super easy, but we got 14th so idk. We checked it over 3 times each and wrote a one-page essay for the tiebreaker! :lol: There was nothing on there I was unsure about though. Can't wait to get the packet and see what I messed up on!
This would be more fun if it were sumobots.
User avatar
ichaelm
Member
Member
 
Posts: 436
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: 40°00′27″N, 75°14′03″W
Division: C
State: PA

Previous

Return to 2010 Lab Events

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest