Anatomy B/C

by **lllazar** on Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:29 pm

Do you guys know if we need to features on bone surfaces?

Btw, looks like respiratory and muscular and endocrine for next year.

Does anyone know any sites with labeling activities for muscles?

by **penclspinner** on Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:29 pm

lllazar wrote:Do you guys know if we need to features on bone surfaces?

After reading thru previous pages on this thread it looks like you should know the bone surface features.

by **Paradox21** on Thu Jun 03, 2010 8:38 pm

lllazar wrote:Does anyone know any sites with labeling activities for muscles?

http://msjensen.cehd.umn.edu/webanatomy ... fault.html

Beware: it doesn't follow the muscle list on SOinc.

I would recommend making diagrams of the muscles for your cheat sheet. Muscles are actually pretty tough to identify. There were several muscles to ID on the nats test and I don't think I could have done a lot of it without my diagrams. They are worth the space on the sheet.

by **tclme elmo** on Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:30 pm

lllazar wrote:Do you guys know if we need to features on bone surfaces?

You definitely should. However, I don't think it's in the rules. but DEFINITELY, definitely learn them. why are you asking? skeletal isn't one of the systems for next year.

lllazar wrote:Btw, looks like respiratory and muscular and endocrine for next year.

And just respiratory and muscular for B division.

Paradox21 wrote:I would recommend making diagrams of the muscles for your cheat sheet. Muscles are actually pretty tough to identify. There were several muscles to ID on the nats test and I don't think I could have done a lot of it without my diagrams. They are worth the space on the sheet.

Do put all the muscles on a sheet. You never know how complicated the diagram will be when given to you.

by **lllazar** on Thu Jun 03, 2010 11:30 pm

tclme elmo wrote:
lllazar wrote:Do you guys know if we need to features on bone surfaces?

You definitely should. However, I don't think it's in the rules. but DEFINITELY, definitely learn them. why are you asking? skeletal isn't one of the systems for next year.

I was asking because i misread respiratory for skeletal. No im not blind i just rush things...like reading

by **foranatdis** on Fri Jun 04, 2010 12:18 am

did anyone think the national's test was extremely easy and unsatisfying? tho.. we got 2nd...w/e ...i thought state was harder but we got still got 1st ..

by **paleonaps** on Fri Jun 04, 2010 5:36 am

Yes! I could have placed wit ha harder event! I was first in the State with a test that we left a whole station blank on!

by **Paradox21** on Fri Jun 04, 2010 10:42 pm

foranatdis wrote:did anyone think the national's test was extremely easy and unsatisfying? tho.. we got 2nd...w/e ...i thought state was harder but we got still got 1st ..

Yeah, the test was very trivial, it seemed. You either knew the answer or didn't. It didn't require a lot of thinking or connecting ideas. My cheat sheet was worth its weight in gold. It had most of the answers. I was also surprised at how little there was on the endocrine system. It seemed like it was covered much less than the muscular and skeletal.

by **foranatdis** on Sat Jun 05, 2010 12:26 am

Paradox21 wrote:
foranatdis wrote:did anyone think the national's test was extremely easy and unsatisfying? tho.. we got 2nd...w/e ...i thought state was harder but we got still got 1st ..

Yeah, the test was very trivial, it seemed. You either knew the answer or didn't. It didn't require a lot of thinking or connecting ideas. My cheat sheet was worth its weight in gold. It had most of the answers. I was also surprised at how little there was on the endocrine system. It seemed like it was covered much less than the muscular and skeletal.

what school are u from/wat did u end up getting?? yea my partner and i knew our stuff pretty well - altho we had to refer to the sheet for things on the national test which were only like origin and insertion sometimes cuz we only somewat studied that - overall the nats test wasnt bad at all whatsoever...im glad i wrote down the diff names of muscular dystrophy cuz those were questions asked on the nats test too

...we knew everything except for three partial questions which were questionable and im pretty sure we got everything else - it was a solid test....so i think that since it was such an easy test it came down to one or two points that the team ahead of us which was Grand Haven just got...ah ...so close to gettin that 1st in nats...w/e congrats to Grand Haven

by **Flavorflav** on Thu Jun 10, 2010 9:56 am

paleonaps95 wrote:Yes! I could have placed wit ha harder event! I was first in the State with a test that we left a whole station blank on!

Which station did you leave blank, and why?

by **mali_16** on Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:11 pm

What topics do you think would be on the C Division?

by **soobsession** on Sat Jun 12, 2010 10:22 pm

mali_16 wrote:What topics do you think would be on the C Division?

On the tentative event list, B division has respiratory and muscular, while C division has repiratory, muscular, and endocrine.
Unless you mean what specifically we're going to have to study?

by **tclme elmo** on Sat Jun 12, 2010 11:57 pm

It will probably be the same or pretty close as far as the muscular system for both divisions, and endocrine for C division.

by **paleonaps** on Fri Jun 18, 2010 9:37 am

I honestly don't really expect it to change at all.

by **sciolykid101** on Fri Jun 18, 2010 2:32 pm

paleonaps95 wrote:I honestly don't really expect it to change at all.

Anatomy is essentially Science of Fitness now. >.>

Anatomy B/C

Re: Anatomy B/C

Re: Anatomy B/C

Re: Anatomy B/C

Re: Anatomy B/C

Re: Anatomy B/C

Re: Anatomy B/C

Re: Anatomy B/C

Re: Anatomy B/C

Re: Anatomy B/C

Re: Anatomy B/C

Re: Anatomy B/C

Re: Anatomy B/C

Re: Anatomy B/C

Re: Anatomy B/C

Re: Anatomy B/C

Who is online